<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Talking about everything in blade servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bladewatch.com/2009/08/05/talking-about-everything-in-blade-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2009/08/05/talking-about-everything-in-blade-servers/</link>
	<description>Tracking Blades, virtualization and grid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luke Shutler</title>
		<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2009/08/05/talking-about-everything-in-blade-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-44664</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Shutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bladewatch.com/?p=6608#comment-44664</guid>
		<description>Scott Alan Miler raises some interesting points in his article, particularly the point he makes about virtualising a SAN infrastructure – blades are indeed beneficial to this kind of environment, offering maximum advantage in terms of flexibility. However, for a small business, virtualising a blade server-based SAN infrastructure can be seen as prohibitive from a cost perspective, so that’s why we at IBM have combined servers, switches, a management component and importantly, an entire storage area network into a single flexible and low-cost solution (BladeCenter S) for small businesses which allows you to ‘virtualise everything’ while helping to lower running and management costs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Alan Miler raises some interesting points in his article, particularly the point he makes about virtualising a SAN infrastructure – blades are indeed beneficial to this kind of environment, offering maximum advantage in terms of flexibility. However, for a small business, virtualising a blade server-based SAN infrastructure can be seen as prohibitive from a cost perspective, so that’s why we at IBM have combined servers, switches, a management component and importantly, an entire storage area network into a single flexible and low-cost solution (BladeCenter S) for small businesses which allows you to ‘virtualise everything’ while helping to lower running and management costs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
