Archive for December, 2007

Fujitsu enhances its blade server range

http://futuresnews.org/technology/fujitsu-seeks-cut-of-ibm-hp-blade-server-share/

Fujitsu Computer Systems has made significant improvements to its «www.internetnews.com», improving performance and reducing energy consumption.

The improved performance is designed to give users faster access to data, quicker application access as well as more efficient and stable communication between the server blades and other system components. The Primergy BX600 S3 blade chassis features a new midplane that Fujitsu said offers three times the I/O throughput of earlier models.

With interfaces for up to 60 1Gbit Ethernet cables and end-to-end Fiber Channel connections, the system offers speeds up to 4Gbits per second. A big part of the performance story is a new Primergy BX620 S4 blade based on Intel’s latest Xeon 5300 quad-core processor.

The BX620 S4 recently set a world record SAP SD Standard Application Benchmark for dual-socket servers, according to Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Fujitsu Computer Systems, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fujitsu Limited.

A BX620 S4 blade server running two quad-core 2.66GHz Intel Xeon X5355 processors (8 Cores, 8 Threads) with SAP ERP 2005, Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition and SQL Server 2005 with 1,870 users resulted in an average dialogue response time of 1.95 seconds.

IDC analyst Jean Bozman said better I/O performance helps makes blade systems in general, and Fujitsu’s in particular, more attractive to enterprise customers. “The I/O throughput is very important for database and line of business applications,” Bozman told internetnews.com. “For any enterprise application where you have to update a database, and that includes multi-tiered applications like CRM and Microsoft Exchange, there’s a lot of I/0 traffic.”

Check out this news about Fujitsu improving its blade chassis which has to be a good thing, this is set to further enhance the Fujitsu blade offering which has to bring more choice to the consumer which has to be a good thing. Will need to read up and find out more.

Blade servers can bring real benefits?

http://www.processor.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2Fp2952%2F31p52%2F31p52.asp&guid=&searchtype=&WordList=&bJumpTo=True

Since their introduction more than six years ago, blade servers have evolved from a clever, high-density packaging solution to an integrated platform incorporating server, network, and storage components. The increased capabilities and convenience of the latest blade products have resulted in revenue for the category soaring more than 40% this year, with the total market estimated by IDC to have passed $1 billion this past quarter. Despite their recent popularity, blades still make up less than 10% of the overall market; however, as IT departments consider spending priorities for the next year, many are likely wondering whether blades should be added to their infrastructure mix. While blades offer a number of advantages over conventional rackmount servers, IT experts don’t give them an unqualified recommendation because blades can pose nasty surprises for users who don’t do their homework.

Check out this interesting commentary about blade servers, it mentions the benefits of the blade platform as well as the challenges that users have had. Deploying blade servers requires a degree of due diligence in terms of the power and cooling, as well as an understanding of scaling up your system deployment and management. The debate is set to continue, in the meantime do check out the article.

Virtualization can save power saving you money

http://hardware.silicon.com/servers/0,39024647,39169518,00.htm?r=1

Now virtualisation is mainstream, fears about putting too many apps on the same server are evaporating. That just leaves the problem of calculating power consumption, as Stewart Baines reports.

Computing may drive efficiency but the data centres that run business are often far from efficient. Servers haven’t traditionally used all of their spare CPU power, because reliability concerns stop administrators running lots of applications on one box.

The extra energy used for those wasted CPU cycles means that an enormous amount of carbon is burned into the atmosphere unnecessarily. But how much? And more importantly, how much energy - and therefore carbon emissions - can be saved by consolidating servers?

Check out this interesting article about the need to be more energy efficient with the data center and the IT infrastructure. It’s got some interesting comments and examples of how virtualization can save you money in terms of the cost of power, an interesting read.

What will the demand be for 1u servers in 2008?

http://gigaom.com/2007/12/18/pizza-boxes-are-power-hogs

As everyone knows, you get what you pay for. That maxim certainly holds true for Internet infrastructure, especially when it comes to servers. Over the past few years there has been an explosion of low-cost appliance servers – also known as pizza box servers — and they now account for a formidable portion of the Internet infrastructure. And though cheap in price, they are turning out to be power hogs.

This article is talking about the 1u server and whether the demand for these servers might lessen due to the cost of powering and cooling them. This might be the case particularly as with virtualization we might be able to replace 3 or 4, (even more) virtual machines on one 2u server, or even have two virtual machines on one 1u server. We’ll have to see, there will still be a case where the 1u server is perfect, for example that box you connect to your NAS to scan for viruses etc.

HP Proliant servers get new Intel Xeon processors

http://cossacks.org.uk/computers/hp-upgrades-multi-processor-based-servers-with-latest-intel-xeon-chips-3/

Hewlett-Packard on Thursday upgraded its lineup of multi-processor based servers with Intel’s latest 7300 series quad-core Xeon processors.

The upgrades include the rack-based ProLiant DL580 G5 and the ProLiant BL680c G5, which is HP’s first four-processor blade server, «www.hp.com»

Among the enhancements to the DL580 G5 is double the memory capacity of its predecessor, making the new product better equipped for handling virtualization. The BL680c G5 blade also has larger memory capacity for the same purpose.

Very cool, it will be interesting to see if the other vendors follow suit, and what benefits in terms of performance or even performance per watt these new generation of Intel processors bring.

Introducing Allen or HP part number 367243-405

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=280185292554&ru=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.ebay.co.uk%3A80%2Fsearch%2Fsearch.dll%3Ffrom%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dm37%26satitle%3D280185292554%26fvi%3D1

Allen is my HP BL30p Blade server which I purchased from a reseller in the US no less from ebay.

I’d been wanting to buy a blade, so that I could take some pictures, go over the basics of the platform as well as write about and document work arounds for issues I experienced with that model (some of which were related to me, not the kit). Also we’d had some questions at work about how they work, what they plug into, and this kind of thing is ideal.

Anyway, the specification are:

  • Dual Intel Xeon 3.2GHz Processors
  • 4GB RAM
  • 10/100/1000 Ethernet
  • No hard drives - they use notebook style drives

I’ve yet to buy one of these (230743-B21 - the diagnostic kit), it’s $2000 so am building myself up to it. The diagnostic kit allows you to connect and run a blade independently of the blade enclosure.

Regardless once Allen is safely delivered, I’ll be doing some content about setting it up, the basics for testing them and those secret hints I learned deploying them in volume. Like which jumper switch to flick so that it returns to factory default, or where the ILO username/password is.

At this point, my disclaimer.

In the interests of remaining vendor neutral, I want to do the same kind of thing for the Dell and IBM blades, but have started with the BL30p because I’ve deployed 500 or so of them, and it was the most affordable at the time on ebay. So sometime next year, after our first meet up, I’ll buy a Dell, IBM and any other blades I can think off and do the same. I Want to also try out the newer blades too.

Are sales in servers set to decline?

http://www.insurancenetworking.com/news/10362-1.html

There is overwhelming evidence that spending on servers is slowing down significantly across a number of market sectors, in some cases by up to a factor of five, according to research conducted by TechNavio from Infiniti Research.

Using TechNavio—a research solution that addresses the spectrum of intelligence needs of IT industry sales and strategic planning teams—Infiniti has identified the trend as the direct result of virtualization deployment and the drive to greener computing.

While the initial pace will be set by large enterprises, the long-term play in green computing is clearly in the small to mid-sized business sector, which typically is less efficient in that they use lower-end servers, and have not gone through server consolidation on the same scale as their larger peers.

Spending on IT is one of those cyclical things and it’s influenced by the markets. It’s easier to get funding or budget for headcount/servers or IT infrastructure when the company is doing well. When the markets are down, or people aren’t feeling quite as positive (’the credit crunch’), IT projects that are deemed unnecessary are often put on hold; particularly when all the economists are trying not to say the r word. It’s not a recession, it’s a slow down, it’s a temporary re-alignment of captial. The IT equivalent of a reboot.

Going forward with virtualization we might find that the demand for servers changes, that’s not to say overnight sales of DL360’s stop, it’s simply that the kind of consumers that bought these servers might find two or three DL380’s running VMWare might be a better bet. But there are still cases where for business, regulatory or even office politcs sake, it’s easier to say “That is your server”, and politely “fill your boots”, the days therefore of the physical server are not numbered, simply the way we buy, provision and use them is. I suspect we might even find that the shelf life, the time we actually keep and use the server lessens as we seek to reduce the hardware support contract and have a fast dynamic infrastructure. Remember, in a virtual world, swapping out a server isn’t the thing that it used to be - I don’t need to do driver pack testing for every platform..

Virtualization as with anything - Delivery is where it counts

http://www.computerworlduk.com/toolbox/green-computing/best-practice/news/index.cfm?newsid=6710

Datacentre managers who championed virtualisation and green computing in 2007 now face the task of delivering the benefits they promised – something industry watchers say will be no small feat.

As projects move beyond the planning phase into broader deployment, datacentre managers will need to evaluate how they are going to manage and support the new technologies without overhauling their entire infrastructure, commentators have warned.

“Virtualisation and green computing will flip-flop for a while, because they represent challenges beyond what they are said to do,” says Robert Whiteley, senior analyst at Forrester Research.

It will be interesting to see as virtualization becomes more mainstream (that’s not to say it isn’t already), how people have dealt with the aspects of service delivery, of managing user expecations or fitting this technology around their internal IT processes or even ITIL. For example, is moving a virtual machine a change? If it is, does the user, the application support or IT raise the change? Managing the technology therefore, as well as the governance around it becomes just as important as making sure that the promises you made are delivered, issues/risks accepted so that when we do have a communication or delivery failure, that we manage and contain it so that life continues, as does the delivery. Let’s not forget that it could be Keith from Investments that de-rails a virtualization project because he had to fill in a change request - document the process, publish it and keep everyone on the same level. Answer/pre-answer the expected questions/comments.

 

Data centers use all the power

http://www.igovernment.in/site/apac-datacenter-energy-usage-to-touch-16-in-2010/

California: The total world server electricity usage from datacenters in Asia and Pacific region, excluding Japan, will increase from 10 per cent in 2000 to about 16 per cent in 2010, while the US share will decrease from 40 per cent to about one-third over that period.

A study released by AMD, based on the data from industry analyst firm IDC, reveals the shifting patterns in worldwide datacenter energy use across five regions including the US, Western Europe, Japan, Asia and Pacific (excluding Japan) and the rest of the world.

The absolute electricity consumption for servers in the Asia and Pacific region under this scenario would more than double from 2005 to 2010, requiring electricity capacity equal to output from two new 1000 MW power plants.

An article I wanted to highlight how much power data centers require, why therefore we need to look at not only the way we build and run data centers, but also the air flow, the cooling as well as the server configuration. Making a 10% saving in your cooling or power requirements, could represent a significant return on investment, particularly as the cost of power continues to be the significant part of your data center costs.

DataSynapse gains award in Financial Services solutions

http://www.gridtoday.com/grid/1913848.html

LONDON, Nov. 27 — DataSynapse Inc., the global provider of application virtualization software, has been recognized by Financial-i as the leader in virtualization solutions for the financial services industry. The accolade was extended through the magazine’s annual “Leaders in Innovation Awards” for 2007.

The awards are decided by an industry advisory panel comprised of leading analyst firms and consultants covering the wholesale transaction banking markets, including Celent, TowerGroup and Bloor. They commend those banks and IT vendors that are shaping the delivery of business solutions in the financial services industry.

Judging criteria focused on product innovation over the last 12 to 18 months, cost effectiveness of solutions in terms of implementation and deployment, potential business benefits, ease of implementation and the ability to tackle specific business issues or problems.

Very cool and well done to DataSynapse. I look forward to seeing what new solutions DataSynapse bring to the market, VersaVision being an example of this.

Regardless of whether you use DataSynapse or Platform, Tangosol or something else, that grid or application virtualization is being recongized shows the potential areas of growth and opportunity in the grid arena, as well as the potential business benefits. In pricing for example, being able to price on demand more quickly than your competition can be the difference between what my economist lecturer would state ‘normal’ and ’supernormal’ profit.