<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How good is virtualization?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/</link>
	<description>Tracking Blades, virtualization and grid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Floating Data Centres - Arr Shiver Me Timbers.. &#171; Virtualization, Windows, Infrastructure and all that &#8220;stuff&#8221; in-between</title>
		<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-40761</link>
		<dc:creator>Floating Data Centres - Arr Shiver Me Timbers.. &#171; Virtualization, Windows, Infrastructure and all that &#8220;stuff&#8221; in-between</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/#comment-40761</guid>
		<description>[...] Combined with a fluid infrastructure (no pun intended!) based virtualized systems&#160; as proposed on blade watch, and you have a portable datacentre. in the event of disaster VMotion all your VMs to another ship and move, when you get there bring them back. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Combined with a fluid infrastructure (no pun intended!) based virtualized systems&nbsp; as proposed on blade watch, and you have a portable datacentre. in the event of disaster VMotion all your VMs to another ship and move, when you get there bring them back. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinf</title>
		<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-29949</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/#comment-29949</guid>
		<description>Great post, fluid infrastructure is a very interesting idea.. I&#039;ve blogged further on the idea at vinf.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, fluid infrastructure is a very interesting idea.. I&#8217;ve blogged further on the idea at vinf.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#34;Fluid&#34; Infrastructure &#171; Virtualization, Windows, Infrastructure and all that &#8220;stuff&#8221; in-between</title>
		<link>http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-29948</link>
		<dc:creator>&#34;Fluid&#34; Infrastructure &#171; Virtualization, Windows, Infrastructure and all that &#8220;stuff&#8221; in-between</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bladewatch.com/2007/11/14/how-good-is-virtualization/#comment-29948</guid>
		<description>[...] Bladewatch has an interesting post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bladewatch has an interesting post here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
