Post
By Martin
Many of the big banks/enterprises are acquiring more data center space, some are closing down their older facilities and having to move equipment. What things would I think about in terms of moving a volume of servers to a new physical data center? Well as I write this on the train home, here they are:
- Consider naming conventions – for example that server called LONSapplication1, is it still called that if it’s in Milton Keynes? In Wales?
- Network latency – are the applications your validated to cope with any latency/network performance issues – real or perceived
- Network resolutions/addressing – does my ip address move? Do we need to scope out a new IP arrange for the new site?
- Storage – do we need any new storage/replication to the site?
- Infrastructure – what new infrastructure do we need? Another domain controller/SMS server, a new build server for the linux servers
- Hardware failures – what level of spares are to be kept during and after the move – what’s the agreement/SLA for fixing a faulty system on installation at the new site
- Hardware support contracts – it might be a remote site hosting blades for a grid application – but what’s the service level agreement, if the enclosure fails when will the vendor be on site to diagnose and repair the issues?
- Efficiency – do we want to move the legacy servers to a new data center? Is the objective virtualization/consolidation? Or is it to get everything more efficiently racked and managed in the new facility.
- Procedures – what are the procedures for granting access to this new data center?
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
2 Comments
Hello webmaster…I found your site via Yahoo! when i was searching for scan ip address, and this post regarding Six things to think about in server migrations really sounds very interesting to me.. Thanks
Simple, concise advice! Why do people make things difficult – especially naming conventions. Where I am the servers are random names but start with letter of server role ie Citrix Server would be Charles, SQL would be Simon, Printers would be trees.
This is all well and good as the reason is security related so when you are down pub chatting away people don’t know what you are on about?
When I suggest UKMIDS000001 or USA00001 etc and to hold all hostnames in an easy database they said they may as well use IP numbers. Oddly enough the bigger side of the business retail/investment have a naming convention similar to my suggestion – so it appears that we are left with those jobs-worths that are either empire protecting or are just plain stupid (this goes for the 3rd party solution provider as well)
I mean you go to pub have a few after work drinks – someone gets a bit geeky and starst talking shop….imagine conversation “Why does Camilla (Citrix Server) keep going down on us? Hmmmm, or like an old ISP of mine names servers after “The Simpsons” but when I did a name lookup on an IP I got DUFF.ISPNET.NET ??? Great
Rant over