Archive for March, 2007
Longview and Datasynapse agreement about grid
http://www.budgetingjournal.com/2007/03/27/longview-solutions-and-datasynapse-announce-partnership/
Longview Solutions and DataSynapse announced that they have entered into an agreement to optimize the Longview Performance Management Platform for operation with DataSynapse GridServer® software. The application is now configured to automatically draw upon underutilized processing power that exists within the IT environment of most organizations. This enables end users in large organizations to quickly and easily handle the large volumes of financial data required to do daily, and even intra-day, P&L reporting on a global basis, a common requirement for a growing number of organizations, especially in the financial services sector.
Very cool, it will be exciting to see what the agreement between the two can bring to the grid table, what opportunities, new solutions can be developed, anything to improve the message, the platform has to be a good thing.
Five things to detract from successful virtualization projects
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9014621
Once virtualization takes hold, it can grow rapidly in many directions and become difficult to manage — a phenomenon that Matt Dattilo, vice president and CIO at PerkinElmer Inc. in Waltham, Mass., calls “VM creep.”
“You have servers here, servers there, but there’s no overall management or function in place. No one is keeping track of what is going on,” says Bruno Janssens, senior architect of infrastructure architectural services at The Hartford in Hartford, Conn.
Check out this article, it’s discussing problems with virtualization. In my experience, they were mainly non-technical, the ownership thing, charge back, support and being able to deliver, which although is a regular thing, is more so with virtualization as often promises about roll back, rapid deployment etc are made, those not being met can easily detract from your successes.
Virtualization projects are rubbish
http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=48800&src=site-marq
Almost half of global virtualisation projects end in failure, new research has claimed.
A poll of 800 organisations around the world commissioned by Computer Associates found that 44 percent of respondents who had deployed server virtualisation technology were unable to declare their deployment a success.
The inability to quantify return on investment was a key factor in this reticence to claim positive results, the research found.
Another article discussing that firms can’t quantify success for their projects. Is it not that I can get the technology in the door, I can provide a virtual infrastructure, but there are still the non-technical issues, billing, support, delivery etc, which might de-rail your project.
Everything might work wonderfully, but if I request a new virtual machine it might take 2 weeks with my standard processes/work flows, in which case from a user perspective, virtualization is rubbish and the project has been a failure.
Let’s not be too hard, let’s focus on getting the processes right, discussing what the issues are and fixing them.
Mac Minis are the next blade
http://www.networkjack.info/blog/archives/35
Intel MacMinis - The OS X Blade Server
A really good client of ours has been colocating with us since late 2003. They’ve grown their web application from running on a Xserve 1.0Ghz DP G4 to an Xserve 2.0Ghz DP G5, then moving their database off to a separate big hardware RAIDed Dell server.
They came to us about a year ago (May 2006) and said they were getting a big new client who wanted to run their entire site on their system and they were going to need a load balanced system with plenty of power and scalability. Earlier in the year (Feb 2006), Apple had introduced their second generation MacMini that now sported the new Intel Core Duo chips along with Gigabit Ethernet. At that time, we were also concerned about increased power usage in our cage, so we picked up an Intel Mac Mini 1.66Ghz Core Duo, had it upgraded to 2GB of RAM (the G4’s could only handle 1GB) and started to really put it through it’s paces.
It turned out to be a real winner.
In terms of power consumption, no matter how hard I tried I could not make that Mini use more than 0.37A of power. I blasted that thing with multiple concurrent CPU and disk bound processes, getting really heavy loads and disk read/writes.
How cool is this? I’m glad to see someone’s tested it!
Mac Mini, the grid engine of the future? I’ve been thinking recently that Mac Mini’s or the tranquil pc would be more effective grid engines, they’re low maintenance, low initial cost and disposable, when the drive fails/memory fails etc a year or two down the road, home pc anyone? The solution for your development/uat grid?
Virtualization is trying to hide application problems
I was having dinner with Chris and I mentioned the following story to him to see his views. Would be interested in your comments.
I was at a meeting discussing virtualization with an IT Manager and his colleague, I was interviewing him (it’s to be posted next week sometime), and his colleague after we’d finished interrupted and said:
“I think you’re recommending vmware because you’re on windows and to hide application problems, I think if you wrote those applications properly and put them on a proper server like AIX or Linux you wouldn’t need vmware, it’s all windows fault. You get my business guys all excited when AIX/Linux is working fine as it is.”
I was kind of surprised by this. Not because I disagree with it in any particular fashion. In many ways the guy is right, all be it in his infrastructure pro-linux fashion, but can we remove all emotion for a second? Life really is too short.
But let me put it to you this way. The application as it is fails let’s say two or three times a month right?Â
During this process, a server engineer is called, a database guy gets called, and application support are called. Say it costs £1 million a year to support, it might cost £5 million in new infrastructure (networks/database/server) and application development cost to fix; so, fixed cost £1 million a year, which is rarely going to change? Or get approval from the business for £5 million investment to write a new application and invest in new toys? You’re choice.
Yes in some cases virtualization and server consolidation is hiding faults in application code; that some applications can’t run at the same time on the same windows server, but you know what, I can live with that.
Could the applications be written better?
Of course, but it’s typically rapid application development, fulfilling an ever rapid business need.
Also consider that we’re doing this not only because of application code problems but institutional failure?
The fact that business teams consider a server as their server, not just tin, a means to an ends, a thing which makes their calculator calculate.
So in the meantime might I request we play nicely, deliver what’s needed to earn revenue and move on. Life’s too short and I’ve got new carpets and a Mac Pro to save up for…
Rackmount or blade for vmware - You decide..
http://issj.sys-con.com/read/315218.htm
IBM and Intel are holding hands now over an initiative to push virtualization on multiprocessors, saying larger, more expandable MP servers deliver the best return on investment.
To prove their point, they’ve come up with a new virtualization benchmarking methodology called vConsolidate that runs multiple instances of consolidated database, mail, web and Java workloads in multiple virtual partitions on IBM’s industry-standard servers that’s supposed to simulate real-world server performance in a typical environment.
It’s supposed to help buyers compare processor platforms and system configurations and pick Intel over AMD.
This sounds fantastic, and might be an ideal way of scoping vmware machine capacity on set platforms. The larger multi processors servers are good, however, I do like the idea of blade servers for vmware, the volume aspect is what attracts me, coupled with the farm idea, the rackmounts you see could easily be cut up and allocated to a business line, give me a blade farm, generic shared infrastructure owned by IT for business service delivery.
Yahoo offers unlimited email mail storage
http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/03/29/yahoo-gives-email-users-unlimited-storage/
The world’s most popular email service is stripping the storage limit on its free email. In response to the increase in the size of email attachments such as large media files, Yahoo is one-upping rivals Google and Microsoft, Reuters reports.
Very cool, particularly for the userbase. Interestingly though, I wonder what technologies they’re going to use to provide this extra storage, storage is a key part of the infrastructure now, and you can only cut costs so much, is this where the storage tier model comes in?
The amount of storage businesses and users need keeps growing month on month, whether it’s the pictures taken with my digital camera, my mp3s or my work documents. Check out the article.
Virtualization the thing for Irish organizations
http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=single8045
29.03.2007 - Earmarking server virtualisation as one of the key technologies to adopt in 2007, analysis firm iReach estimates that a third of Irish organisations will go down this route this year.
“IT buyers are becoming more and more aware of the benefits a virtualised environment can bring and with this in mind will invest in such technologies,†said Neil Brennan, an analyst with iReach said.
Very cool, virtualization is a fantastic tool for consolidation, or as another way of providing your server/desktop infrastructure for carbon neutral business, or in order to maximize the benefit from your hardware. Whether you use virtual iron/vmware or xen source, think about the strategy, the way you do business, virtualization can bring real benefits but only if your organizational processes are set up to do so, manage the delivery, users perceptions and focus on using the technology for the maximum benefit within your organizational constraints. Check out the article, it’s an interesting read.
Boot Camp works with Vista
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/109072/boot-camp-update-puts-vista-on-the-mac.html
Apple has updated Boot Camp to support Windows Vista, quashing once and for all rumours that incompatibility with Microsoft’s latest operating system would delay the shipping of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard.
The new release - version 1.2 - remains a beta, and is a free 138MB download from apple.com’s bootcamp pages.
Very cool and worth checking out. This gives me another excuse for purchasing a mac pro…
British Land goes carbon neutral
http://www.edie.net/news/news_story.asp?id=12816&channel=0
Britain’s ‘biggest landlord’ to go carbon neutral (28 March 2007)
One of the United Kingdom’s largest property developers has pledged to become carbon neutral by 2008/9, according to a report published on Wednesday.
In its new Corporate Responsibility Report, British Land PLC outlines its initiatives aimed at reducing energy and associated CO2 emissions in landlord-controlled areas.
In 2006, energy usage reduced by 4% across the portfolio and water by 16 per cent. The biggest CO2 improvements came from the London Offices portfolio. Meadowhall Shopping Centre, one of British Land’s largest assets, reduced energy consumption by 11%. The report also sets ambitious targets for 2007 in areas including biodiversity, waste management and community involvement.
Very cool, moving towards Carbon neutral business is great for British Land and should encourage others to follow suit.

